Skip to main content

Forgotten Film Friday: Melinda and Melinda

 A retrospective by Brooks Rich

I know Woody Allen is a complicated figure. He is a creep in a lot of ways and some people find his sexual weirdness to be too much. I get that. But on the blog I sometimes like to separate the art from artist. Not always to be sure. Jeepers Creepers will never be covered here because Victor Salva is a useless piece of human garbage. What he did I can't ignore. Allen I can push aside him being weird to cover him now and then. It's hard to write a film blog and not mention a Woody Allen film now and then. The man has some bangers. And I've always wanted to cover this film. The concept is so interesting and Allen post 2000 is fertile ground for Forgotten Film Friday. So let's look at the film and not Allen himself. 

Melinda and Melinda is a dual narrative about a woman named Melinda, an underrated and brilliant Radha Mitchell, who shows up unexpectedly at a dinner party in New York. The film questions if life is inherently tragic or comic and the two different narratives tell the following story as a tragedy and comedy. Each narrative has similar beats but go different ways based on if it's funny or sad. The story is basic and the film really leans on the dual narrative gimmick. 

This is not a lost classic in Allen's filmography. Melinda and Melinda is not going to be on any list with Annie Hall or even Manhattan, a film I find to be the worst of Allen being pretentious. But this is a solid film and I think there's a lot working here. Mitchell is absolutely the film's strongest trait. She makes the two Melinda's feel different from each other and both performances feel real. Also Will Ferrell is the Woody Allen counterpart in this film and that just makes sense. He is the other thing that really works. This is a great underrated Ferrel performance. Not up there with his all timer performance in Stranger Then Fiction but he is still very good in this. 

Some of this doesn't work. Dialogue can be real clunky and stilted. Characters recap what someone said off camera to catch the audience up. I hate that in screenwriting. It's like when someone in a movie says as you know followed by something the audience needs to hear. Ugh the worst. I really have an issue with unnatural dialogue that is only there for the benefit of the audience. No one would speak this way but they have to in order to get plot points across.

Also what are these homes these people live in? The main couple of each film has an out of work actor as the guy of the couple. Why are they living in these multi million dollar New York homes? Jonny Lee Miller's Lee in the tragic story is such an over the top asshole it plays more comedically than tragic. But I guess that can be a point Allen is making. Really comedy and tragedy are intertwined in real life. Something can be so tragically over the top it reads as humorous. I get that sure. 

I think this is worth a watch. Some might think I'm crazy and this is a nothing note in Allen's overall filmography. Even some might hate everything about this film. That could happen to be sure. But I think this will really work for some people. The two narratives will interest them enough to find something meaningful here. And at the least I think this is worth a watch once for Mitchell's performance alone. Melinda and Melinda. It's no Blue Jasmine but it's better than Stardust Memories. 



Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Forgotten Film Friday: Absolute Power

Clint Eastwood stars as Luther Whitney, a jewel thief who works in the Washington DC area. One night while he is stealing from a mansion he is forced to hide in a secret compartment with a two way mirror. From there he observes a sexual rezendevous with the wife of a powerful man and the President of the United States Alan Richmond (Gene Hackman) Suddenly the president gets aggressive and while defending herself the woman is shot to death by two Secret Service agents. Luther manages to get away with a letter opener the woman stabbed the president with. At first Luther plans to flee the country. But when he is disgusted by a statement the president makes, Luther decides to expose the crime. I miss these kind of films. The nineties was a great time for thrillers exactly like this. They are not the flashiest films but they are also not obsessed with big action scenes. It's all plot and character with them. Sure this plot might be a little out there but Eastwood makes it work. He's...
1 comment
Read more

The Texas Chainsaw Massacre (1974)

A retrospective by Brooks Rich Let's kick off the spooky season with a bona fide classic. I love the horror genre, but not much really scares or creeps me out. Most horror films I just watch and enjoy. However, 'The Texas Chainsaw Massacre' is one of those that really gets under my skin, and not just because the Sawyer family are eating people. The way Tobe Hooper shoots the film gives it an almost documentary feel. If you have never seen 'Texas Chainsaw Massacre,' you should probably fix that immediately. Do I need to explain what it's about? A group of '70s kids is driving across Texas in a van and runs afoul of the Sawyer family, including the man himself, Leatherface. It's a classic of the horror genre and one of the pioneers of the '70s and '80s horror boom. The film has a reputation for being sickeningly bloody and violent, but that is not true. It's essentially a bloodless film, which makes it even more horrifying. Most of the violence...
Post a Comment
Read more

John Candy month

 What can you say about John Candy? He was a comic genius who was taken from us too soon. There were a lot of comedic heavyweights of the eighties and nineties but Candy stood above most of them. If there is a Mount Rushmore of comedy I imagine John Candy would be on it. For the month of July we are honoring this comic genius. 
Post a Comment
Read more